Cooperstown Crier - Your Source for Hometown News - Cooperstown, Baseball Hall of Fame

Hawthorn Hill

April 1, 2010

Hawthorn Hill: Reflections

Several days ago the health care bill passed. I am glad that it did.

It is certainly not a perfect bill and there are aspects of it, especially such shenanigans as the ``Cornhusker Kickback,’’ that rankle. But anyone familiar with any political process, be it village or national politics, knows that in order to get anything done deals are made, compromises are forged, and lofty aspirations often fall prey to more modest, politically achievable results.

One of these days I hope we do find the moral fortitude as a nation to care enough about one another to create a system of universal health care for all.

There is a strange and troubling irony about our national penchant for starting wars in far away places knowing full well that thousands on both sides will die.

And that those who happen to survive such inexcusable barbarism will suffer in innumerable ways for the rest of their lives. What is it that makes it so easy for us to go to war, even begin them under false pretenses, and suggest that those of us who oppose such idiocies are somehow less patriotic because we see no earthly, or spiritual, justification for such self-destructive escapades in the first place. There is just something downright puzzling about the way in which we set national priorities. Frankly, I do not care a whit which political party anyone belongs to. I wish we could do away with them.

Madison warned us about factionalism a long time ago and his fears have come home to roost. People are so dug into their factional foxholes these days that civil discussion is nigh impossible.

I need not review the ugliness that certain partisans have exhibited publicly the past several weeks.

It is not surprising, really, since anyone whose head is not buried in the sand knows that ugliness, most often nurtured by fear and ignorance, is alive and well throughout this land. Unfortunately, we share this pathology with the rest of the world. I wish I was optimistic about its eradication. The extent to which we live in fear of terrorist attacks is a testament to the heightened levels of insanity that hatred has evolved to.

The operative credo is simple: to get your way, or at least make your point, kill as many innocent people as you like. Then have the audacity to attribute your actions to your personal deity.

The same mentality seems to pervade politics. If you do not agree with someone, then do the honorable thing: vilify him. If you do not believe that government should involve itself in health care, then call those that do communists, socialists or, even worse, Hitlerites. If you believe that government does have a role, then castigating all those who disagree as cold-hearted, uncaring, and greedy seems to suffice.

Even though I hold some relatively liberal views, I also think of myself as equally conservative with respect to certain issues. I guess what matters is how you define your terms. It used to be that our legislators would debate by day, often disagreeing vehemently, but come nightfall they would dine together and often go on family weekend trips together.

We have lost some fine people from both sides of the aisle because politics has become more personal than ever. Mean-spirited divisiveness has replaced civil dissent, a necessary cornerstone of any democracy.

The abortion debate brings out the worst in us.

If you believe that a woman has the right to make her own reproductive decisions, including the termination of a pregnancy, then you are characterized as a ``baby killer.’’ If, on the other hand, you characterize yourself as being ``pro-life,’’ a rather ambiguous phrase at best, the tendency is to claim the moral high ground as yours alone. The implication, then, is that those who see things differently are spiritually bankrupt. Of course, any rift rooted in theological conflict is ideologically irresolvable. And the beat goes on.

My antidote to all this is to take a very long walk.

Text Only
Hawthorn Hill
  • Up On Hawthorn Hill: Bird Feeder?

    Bird feeder is a relative term. At least that is the case around here. A few mornings ago we spotted the first rabbit to visit the feeders. Normally, all we see during the winter are rabbit tracks crisscrossing the gardens.

    February 10, 2012

  • Up on Hawthorn Hill: Making sense of things

    A book I have been reading investigates the various ways over time that we have made sense of the world. It carries the reader through to the present via several seminal classical texts and ultimately aims to suggest a strategy for “ finding meaning in a secular age.”

    January 30, 2012

  • Up on Hawthorn Hill: Of birds and faith

    I watch birds quite a bit. Every five days or so I send in  a report to Cornell as partof its annual Project Feeder Watch program. The data, collected from volunteers from all over the country, enables scientists to track population trends. I would spend quite a bit of time checking out the visitors to our feeders anyway. Participating in the feeder program makes a personal pleasure that much more meaningful. It is rare that aesthetical and scientific endeavors work in tandem.

    January 12, 2012

  • Up on Hawthorn Hill: Circularity

    When she was a puppy my dog Gabby would run in what I described then as “circles of joy.” She celebrated her15th birthday a few weeks ago and despite the inevitable frailties that old age imposes upon all of us, she is doing pretty well.

    December 29, 2011

  • Up on Hawthorn Hill: Irony abounds

    These are querulous times. Dissent and disagreement, as uncomfortable as they sometimes are, are essential components of a viable democracy. Democracies are always messy because everyone has a right to speak his mind and because whenever a majority is able to gain the numerical upper hand it pretty much runs the show. Several political philosophers have written quite persuasively of what they characterize as the “tyranny of the majority.” Get enough people on your side and you have the opportunity to get your way so long as you are able to maintain power. I suspect that most thoughtful people would agree that wisdom is hard to come by.

    December 19, 2011

  • Up on Hawthorn Hill: Of kinglets and mortality

    This is that transitional time of year when fall begins to take its final bow and winter starts to seep into our lives not always with a great deal of subtlety. It is also a time when body seems quite willing to step aside and let mind have dominant sway for a while.

    November 17, 2011

  • Up On Hawthorn Hill: Wisdom

    I do not know about anyone else, but I tired of selfcongratulatory political talk a long time ago. Fact is, I have never liked it much. One candidate interviewed yesterday had nothing at all good to say about the present administration. In the process of lambasting its record on just about every front, this individual never once offered any specifics as to how he would go about creating jobs, ending Medicare fraud, or terminating these idiotic wars that we seem intent on embroiling ourselves in.

    June 17, 2011

  • Up On Hawthorn Hill: Rights

    There is a lot of chatter these days about rights. It gives one pause.  Several weeks ago I heard a politician claim that it is time to win our country back. I was not aware that we had lost it. I wonder who stole it. If you ask a rabid conservative, the answer will most likely be those bleeding heart liberals.

    April 28, 2011

  • Up On Hawthorn Hill: Looking for diversions

    It has been a long, psychically trying winter. I always feel more comfortable knowing that I am not alone, so when friends complain openly about cabin fever and wanting “to get the hell out of here” for a while I know exactly what they mean. We are planning a trip to Costa Rica in March, so in order to keep one’s head above the darkening inner clouds, it is necessary to look for diversions that have, as Wordsworth put it, a renovating virtue. Luckily for me, Redpolls fit the bill.

    March 17, 2011

  • Hawthorn Hill: Quietness

    I want to make a case for quietness. Thoreau writes that he never found a companion as companionable as solitude. It is a sentiment that I share. As I sit here looking out over the snow-covered hills I am struck by the absence of movement. I am awed by a stillness unstirred by wind or activity of any kind. There is no noise, neither human nor animal. How nice that is.

    February 3, 2011