Cooperstown Crier - Your Source for Hometown News - Cooperstown, Baseball Hall of Fame

Columns

December 29, 2011

In These Otsego Hills: Coming up ... 2012

Difficult as it seems, 2011 is fast coming to an end. And it is always our hope that as a year draws to a close, the issues which have been in the forefront during the year will be resolved. Unfortunately, we suspect that will not be the case this year. Instead, we are fairly certain that many of the issues that plagued this year, will continue to plague next year. Thus we will find ourselves still musing about the same issues we have spent time with already. And  while we have not come toany conclusions about many of the issues, we do think they would all likely benefit from both sides thinking critically about perspective, risk assessment and possible solutions.

There has been much debate this past year that leads us to think that putting issues into perspective may soon be a thing of the past. So often it seems that stances taken by one side or the other are  viewed very narrowly withoutthought as to how any given issue might be part the greater scheme of things. It often seems that Otsego County has been presented as a self-sustaining entity separate from, and better than, the rest of New York State, the U.S.A. or the world for that matter.

As a result, it seems that there is an attitude that this area does not need to be part of energy solutions but rather is entitled to be part of the problem without any thought of being part of the solution. In fact there doesn’t seem to be an energy source proposed in this area that is acceptable.

Yet there still seems to be many people who are quite happy to use energy as long as they are not involved in it’s production.

Likewise, we don’t seem to see a great deal of perspective when it comes to addressing risks. At times it seems that all perceived risks are of equal value. The risk of hitting a pothole is the same as the risk of being hit by lightning which is evidently the same as the risk of being crushed by a boa constrictor. Almost everything undertaken in the world has a certain amount of risk associated with it. The trick is, of course, is to be able to assess that risk and decide which is greater, the risk or the benefit of any given undertaking.

Yet, all too often, any amount of risk seems to override any possible benefit as if everything is indeed black and white and no matter what, the risk will always win.

This, we suspect, explains the “No drill, No spill” signs that dot the landscape. Although we are not certain, we assume these signs suggest that as long as there is no drilling for any form of energy in the area, we will be free from any hazardous effects of energy sources.

We don’t understand exactly how this works as we have first-hand knowledge of energy spills in the area without there being any energy production here at all.

These spills run the gamut from tanker truck accidents to problems delivering oil to basement oil tanks.

And over the years, there have been many problems resulting from underground storage tanks. In fact, we have long thought such tanks present a hidden problem waiting to happen. Therefore we were somewhat relieved to learn that what we have long worried about, namely the containment from petroleum in an underground storage tank at a neighborhood gas station, is not nearly the concern that it once was.

In a piece written by Uni Blake, Environmental Toxicologist, we learned that “There are close to 600,000 underground storage tanks (UST) in the U.S. These tanks contain either petroleum or hazardous materials. A leak from a UST means certain groundwater contamination. Groundwater supplies must be protected since they supply a large majority of the drinking water for US residents. Regulations have been developed at the federal and state level to effectively minimize the incidents of leakage, rusting, and spillage of petroleum from UST. The UST program has successfully managed to protect water. Therefore, the concept of effective containment works...”

And thus we feel we have been able to reassess our concerns about underground tanks. And with proper regulation and enforcement, we suspect other concerns can likewise be mitigated.

Yet we are not at all certain that any credence is given by others to the fact that, given the development of new technology, assessment of risk can, and should change.

This country has always been innovative and creative, coming up with new solutions to problems which have limited possibilities in the past. And any judgment of issues does need to change as technology surrounding the issues moves forward. And while these changes may not seem to happen as quickly as we would like, to ignore them is to ignore progress.

We also think that we are at a point where many people are unable to articulate both sides of an issue. And for the life of us, we cannot understand how a decision on any issue can be made without understanding all sides of the issue. Without thinking critically about an issue it does not seem possible to be able to meaningfully weigh the issue’s pros and cons.

And without critical thinking, so often decisions are made based on what might well be termed mass hysteria. And the result is rarely, if ever, rational.

Unfortunately, it does at times seem that critical thinking is indeed the other national deficit. Too many times the steps necessary to make an informed decision are bypassed as it is easier to go along with the flow. At a time when researching issues is easier than ever before, and access to opposing points of view are readily available, it seems that fewer people are interested in learning about both the pros and the cons of any given issue.

As our sister wrote us recently in an email “Life is full of infinite possibilities with a corresponding range of probabilities. Every day there is some chance of being hit by an asteroid. Perhaps we should just stay in bed and wait for the arrival.” Or maybe we should continue to muse on the issues with which we are faced, making certain that we fully understand both the pros and the cons of any given issue before forming our opinions.

PLEASE NOTE: Comments regarding this column may be made by mail at 105 Pioneer Street, Cooperstown, NY 13326, by telephone at 607-547-8124 or by e-mail at cellsworth1@stny.rr.com.

Text Only
Columns

New Today!