Few sports have experienced as much of a metamorphosis as tennis over the last 40 years. Not only has it grown to become a truly international game, but technology and money have changed the way the game is played and marketed. Where tennis was once a mixture of power and finesse it has now become a game of sheer power.
Kids today don’t hit the ball with the traditional forehand and backhand grip. They use an exaggerated “western” or “eastern” grip with the idea of developing greater topspin on the ball. I can’t really explain the grips except they look like the equivalent of a pro wrestler getting his arm twisted off by an opponent.
If you can master the shot, perhaps by practicing eight hours a day for 10 years, you might be as successful as Spain’s Rafael Nadal, winner of 10 grand slam events. But since most people do nothave that sort of dedication, it’s more likely you’ll put 10balls over the fence for every winner you hit.
The most unfortunate part of today’s game is the loss of the serve and volley. With so many young players content to blast away from the baseline they apparently have either never heard of a volley or simply can’t execute one.
The change in technology is so complete that the last true serve and volley player retired last year.
Back in 1980 tennis was in the midst of a golden era where space-age racquets and big money were just beginning to make an impact. Wood racquets were still commonplace, as were players with colorful (i.e., obnoxious) personalities and all-around games.
Put together it provided fans with some of the most memorable rivalries and matches imaginable.
Matthew Cronin, a tennis columnist for Fox Sports and Inside Sports magazine, has written a tome to that bygone era, “Epic: John McEnroe, Bjorn Borg, and the Greatest Tennis Season Ever.” Its focus is two “epic” matches played by McEnroe and Borg in the finals of the 1980 Wimbledon and U.S. Open tournaments.
Their fourth set tiebreaker at Wimbledon, won 18-16 by McEnroe, is considered the greatest tiebreaker of all time.
The book is much more than just a rehashing of two incredible matches. It discusses the elevation in tennis’s popularity, the developing rivalries that fed the rise of the sport, and the disparate personalities and their effect on the game. The one thing that tennis had back then, for better or worse, was the characters the sport endured.
John McEnroe is considered one of the best analysts in tennis today. He knows the game and players and isn’t hesitant to praise or criticize.
However, back in his playing days he was considered one of the biggest jerks (a kind way of putting it) to ever hold a racquet. The British tabloids called him “Super Brat,” a moniker he richly deserved.
McEnroe was apparently a nice guy off the court, but he couldn’t control his temper on it. He gave a new meaning to the word “whining.” He constantly harassed umpires and linesmen and disrupted opponents with his antics. Many of his contemporaries are still bitter today over his behavior.
Jimmy Connors was another tennis superstar and he was even worse than McEnroe. At least McEnroe’s outbursts appeared to be unrehearsed. Conners’ were calculated. He knew how to get a crowd riled up and psych out an opponent. Of course it was especially“fun” when these two “characters” matched up mano-amano.
They literally despised each other. McEnroe referred to Connors as a “complete [bleep]” and Connors called McEnroe a “[bleepin’] brat.” Their matches provided not only scintillating tennis, but great theater.
Into this mix came Sweden’s Bjorn Borg, who was the consummate gentleman. He had ice in his veins. He was the equivalent of Roger Federer today, an incredibly talented player, who is so well-mannered that you instinctively root for him.
Both McEnroe and Connors tended to be on their best behavior when they played him. Borg commanded that kind of respect.
I remember watching a retrospective of the epic Wimbledon tiebreaker between McEnroe and Borg. Not only was there no whining, but neither player ever stoppedto get a drink or towel off between points. That was how the game was played back then. Today toweling off after every point is considered a divine right.
Cronin’s reflections don’t mean that today’s game isn’t better than it was 30 years ago. Nadal, Federer, and recent Wimbledon champion Novak Djokovic may well be the best players of all-time.
But there was something special about that era when the various styles of play and personalities stood out. “Epic” is simply a bit of nostalgia that reminds us how entertaining a game tennis can be.
Book Notes
September 29, 2011
Book Notes: The changing sport of tennis
- Book Notes
-
- Memoir reflects on 'roller-coaster life and career' Apparently, the third time wasn't the charm. The way Reynolds described him, the third husband was worse than the first two combined and that's saying a lot. Eddie Fisher literally walked away from Reynolds and their two infant children to chase a sex goddess. At least he got his just desserts when Elizabeth Taylor tossed him aside for Richard Burton.
- 'Who's on Worst?' reveals the ugly in baseball The Baseball Hall of Fame celebrates the greatest players, managers and owners from our national pastime. Any of us who have watched Major League baseball have inevitably seen some of these immortals practicing their craft. But we have also likely witnessed a sample of their opposite brethren, players who shouldn't have been in the Major Leagues. Has there ever been a definitive source that "celebrates" the non-accomplishments of the worst that Major League baseball has to offer?
- Book takes readers on path for equal rights One of the most troubling aspects of our history is race relations. It takes a long time to achieve true equality in a society when the heritage of one ethnic group is slavery and Jim Crow laws. Even today African Americans are more likely to be stereotyped as athletes than doctors, lawyers or entrepreneurs. The path to a "color-blind" nation is still a work in progress.
- Piazza wasn't considered much of a prospect for the majors It's probably going to be a quiet few days in Cooperstown when Hall of Fame weekend rolls around this summer. The baseball writers did not elect anybody this year despite some heavyweight candidates. The problem was that at least three of the poster boys for the steroids era, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Sammy Sosa, were on the ballot for the first time. The writers were clearly making a statement when nobody got elected.
- Who would have thought e-books would be so popular? When I was in library school 25 years ago, a future concept was presented that seemed absurd at the time. It was the notion you could read books on a small computerized device about the size of a pocketbook.
- 2012 was a year of great films, future favorites The year 2012 was a blockbuster year for great films. Several of the movies up for Best Picture would have been runaway favorites almost any other time. They will make for easy pickings for the library when they become available on DVD.
- Blockbusters are not the only movies worth watching Hollywood makes enough movies that there are always a few that you don't hear about until they are on DVD. Sometimes they are simply horrible films that end their theater run quickly, but often they are "diamonds in the rough" that made their mark at film festivals.
- Mickey Mantle biography shows the good and the ugly It has become obvious in recent days that bestowing "hero" status on athletes is a misplaced priority.
- Book looks at 50 years of James Bond movies When I was in elementary school, James Bond was all the rage. For some reason I didn't see any of the early films with Sean Connery playing the infamous 007 British spy, but my siblings and several friends certainly did.
- Two thumbs up for the film 'Arbitrage" Arbitrage is a word that 99.99 percent of us probably never heard of until the movie with that title appeared. I looked it up on Wikipedia and discovered why nobody had heard of it. It refers to Wall Street financiers and has a meaning so convoluted that I couldn't figure it out.
- More Book Notes Headlines

